Spend $50 and get 25% off plus free shipping | Use code 25FREESHIP.

Skip to content


Series Editor: Timothy Campbell, Cornell University

Is there any concern more pressing today than thinking what it means to have in common? From debates on biotechnology and shared gene pools, to the relation between the digital commons and public culture, to political and theological genealogies of the common and community, to the fraying European Community, one of the most decisive questions for contemporary life concerns what having and being in common entails.

Where the common and community are concepts, ‚Äúcommonalities‚ÄĚ captures the dynamism of the relations that make up both; the relation of the common not only to subjects and individuals but to other living entities as well as objects. Where perspectives on the common and community are largely indebted to what has been called ‚Äúpolitical theology,‚ÄĚ the perspective provided by ‚Äúcommonalities‚ÄĚ is political in the sense that it concerns itself primarily with emerging forms of being together and having together. Not surprisingly, in ‚Äúcommonalities‚ÄĚ communication moves to the center but not the protected and ultimately unsatisfying communication that so dominates interactions today. Rather communication among ‚Äúcommonalities‚ÄĚ resembles a contamination of approaches and perspectives that leads to new modes of being. Where before there was always and only the common and its privileged form, the community, now a horizon for thought becomes available that is capable of accounting for immanent (and possibly common) singularities. ‚ÄúCommonalities‚ÄĚ will name a research project in which the common becomes a mode of investigating and writing the political: a way of creating collectively that discloses the immanent singularities that characterize the contemporary moment.

The series Commonalities registers such a moment for thinking the political across the common. Featuring works that take up the question and the promise of the common ecumenically, Commonalities is not limited to any one philosophical tradition. Rather it spotlights the forms that the common assumes in a number of disciplines and traditions: in greater attention to the importance of relationality and interdependence; in biopolitical research; and in ongoing critiques of all forms of the common thought merely as instances of political theology. In a word the series is addressed to those interested in imagining possible worlds held in common.